skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 243213     Find in a Library
Title: Dimensional Review of Scales for Forensic Photography
Author(s): Massimiliano Ferrucci ; Theodore D. Doiron ; Robert Thompson ; John P. Jones II ; Susan M. Ballou ; Janice A. Neiman
Date Published: 08/2013
Page Count: 48
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2010-DN-R-7121
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study evaluated the quality of commercially available photo scales that provide a geometrical reference in the photographic documentation of evidence, documents manufacturing processes, and suggests procedures for establishing standards for forensic photo scales that will ensure accuracy and user confidence.
Abstract: The results from each test indicate that all vendors satisfied the length scale specification as written in the ABFO No. 2 technical note; however, the measurements of internal and external circle diameters and center-to-center distance showed a lack of adherence to specifications. Still, the results for each vendor were consistent. The testing for perpendicularity of the two legs showed that more than half of the rulers tested were off from the ABFO No. 2 specification. In addition, there was inconsistency between rulers of the same vendor. The 4-year revisit found minimal changes in length scale, internal and external circle diameters, and center-to-center distance. Perpendicularity, on the other hand, exhibited significant change. Having a master rule with the marks within 0.1 mm of their nominal position is a reasonable requirement. There are also a number of accredited laboratories that can calibrate these master rules to the required accuracy. Plastic scales cannot be expected to hold this accuracy in actual use. A new standard could be used to better define the materials allowed for scales, criteria for the dimensions and legibility of markings, and optimizing targets for photography. 3 notes, 34 figures, and 7 tables
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Evidence collection ; Photography ; Standards ; Equipment evaluation ; Photography techniques ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265288

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.