skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 243347  Add to Shoppping Cart  
Title: Making Sense of DNA Backlogs, 2012 - Myths vs. Reality
  Document URL: HTML (ePub) HTML (MOBI) PDF 
Author(s): Mark Nelson ; Ruby Chase ; Lindsay DePalma
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 12/2013
Page Count: 20
  Annotation: This report updates the status of DNA backlogs in the United States in 2012 from a similar report for 2010 (NCJ 232197).
Abstract: Although laboratory capacity for processing DNA evidence has increased and laboratories processed 10 percent more forensic DNA cases in 2011 than in 2009, DNA backlogs continued to increase, because the demand for forensic DNA casework in 2011 increased by 16.4 percent over 2009 demands. Thus, the demand continues to outpace the Nation’s capacity to process forensic DNA. A “backlogged” case is defined as “one that has not been closed by a final report within 30 days after receipt of the evidence into the laboratory.” The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) further requires reporting laboratories to define a “backlogged” DNA from convicted offenders and arrestees as “one that has not been tested and uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) within 30 days of the receipt of the sample into the laboratory.” Efforts to expand laboratory capacity for processing forensic DNA data and convicted offender and arrestee DNA samples have included increased automation, the hiring of more personnel, the use of overt-time, and improved testing procedures and methods. The Federal Government has funded these activities through NIJ’s DNA Backlog Reduction Program. Although 52.2 percent fewer database samples from convicted offenders and arrestees were completed in 2011 than in 2009, new demands to test and upload database samples declined 51.2 percent; as a result, the overall workload decreased 46.3 percent from 2009. NIJ’s funding program for expanding laboratories’ capacity for DNA processing is based in a holistic, evidence-based, three-step approach: research and development in new technologies for processing DNA, the implementation of these new technologies development, and testing and evaluation to ensure the technologies work as intended. 10 exhibits
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Crime Laboratories (Crime Labs) ; Efficiency ; Productivity ; Case processing ; Crime laboratory management ; DNA fingerprinting ; Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) ; DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) ; DNA Typing ; Forensic Laboratories
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Annual/Periodic)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.