skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 243782     Find in a Library
Title: Promising Strategies: Public Law 280
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Duane Champagne ; Carole Goldberg
Corporate Author: Tribal Law and Policy Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2013
Page Count: 54
  Annotation: This report highlights promising strategies that have resulted from passage of Public Law 280.
Abstract: This report from the Tribal Law and Policy Institute highlights promising strategies that have resulted from passage of Public Law 280. In 1953 Congress enacted Public Law 280 (PL 280) to give certain named States criminal and civil jurisdiction on reservations and to withdraw most of the Federal Government’s responsibility for criminal jurisdiction in Indian Country. In PL 280 jurisdictions, the overlapping jurisdiction of State and tribal courts over criminal prosecutions and civil actions often leads to complications and misunderstandings between different government agencies. This report highlights programs that were developed to overcome the difficulties arising in PL 280 jurisdictions. The programs were selected according to the following criteria: innovative, replicable, sustainable, culturally compatible, community component of services, respect for and enhancement of tribal authority, fairness, intergovernmental cooperation, and management effectiveness. The programs highlighted in this report include 1) Kake Peacemaking Court System, 2) Joint Powers Policing Agreement between the Hoopa Valley Tribe and the County of Humboldt, 3) Intergovernmental Policing Agreement between the Hopland Band of Pomo Indians and Various Federal and County Agencies, 4) State Peace Officer Status to Tribal Police in Oregon, 5) Intertribal Court of Southern California, 6) Memorandum of Understanding, Protecting of Battered Indian Women in Minnesota, 7) Washington State Joint - Executive Legislative Workgroup on Tribal Retrocession, 8) Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council’s Special Committee on State - Tribal Relations, 9) Wisconsin State Gaming Appropriations and Policing Grants, 10) Wisconsin Tribal Judges Association, and 11) Tribal Representatives in the Maine Legislature.
Main Term(s): Tribal Courts
Index Term(s): Jurisdiction ; Tribal community relations ; Tribal court system ; General Jurisdiction Courts ; Tribal police ; Criminal justice system reform ; Social reform ; Tribal
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-IC-BX-K004
Sale Source: Tribal Law and Policy Institute
8235 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 211
West Hollywood, CA 90046
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.