skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 243979     Find in a Library
Title: FY 2011 Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects: Evaluability Assessment of the Boston Reentry Initiative
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Jennifer Hardison Walters ; Erin Kennedy ; Aaron Horvath
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America

RTI International
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2013
Page Count: 29
  Annotation: This study conducted an evaluability assessment (determination of whether a project is a candidate for meaningful evaluation) of the Boston Reentry Initiative (BRI), a FY 2011 Second Chance Act (SCA) demonstration site, whose grant-mandated goals are to increase reentry programming for returning prisoners and their families; reduce recidivism of program participants by 50 percent over 5 years, reduce parole violations, and improve reintegration outcomes.
Abstract: The BRI evaluability assessment (EA) determined that although the BRI has been subjected to rigorous local evaluation, process and cost evaluations would supplement previous and ongoing evaluation research; process and cost evaluations would likely provide useful information for practitioners, program developers, and policymakers. The BRI is a well-established, stable program with clearly defined components, consistent selection and enrollment processes, and a steady case flow sufficient to support an outcome evaluation in addition to process and cost evaluations. The majority of key stakeholders expressed a basic understanding of and appreciation for evaluation. They were receptive to the EA team and to additional evaluation; however, they expressed concern about redundancy of a national evaluation given the ongoing local evaluation. Stakeholders did not have questions for future evaluation beyond recidivism reduction. Several stakeholders were interested in program improvement, particularly in the areas of housing and employment, as well as best practices and strategies for preventing criminal behavior among youth. The BRI is founded on long-standing collaborations between law enforcement, prosecutorial, and faith-based and community-based organizations. It uses a joint public-safety and social-service approach in reducing violent, gun, and gang crime among young male offenders with extensive, serious criminal histories. BRI supports their reintegration into their high-crime neighborhoods after their incarceration. EA methodology is explained in detail, along with BRI program components and activities. 3 exhibits, 4 references, and appended logic models
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Prerelease programs ; Post-release programs ; NIJ final report ; Massachusetts ; Performance Measures ; Reentry
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-R2-CX-0032
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For the executive summary of the full report, see NCJ-243978; and for the other individual site reports, see NCJ-243980-88.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.