skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 244347   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Cross-Site Analysis of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Comprehensive Communities Program
Author(s): George L. Kelling ; Sandra K. Costello ; Mona R. Hochberg ; Ann Marie Rocheleau ; Dennis P. Rosenbaum ; Jeffrey A. Roth ; Wesley G. Skogan ; William H. Sousa
Date Published: 11/1999
Page Count: 248
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 94-IJ-CX-0065; 96-DD-BX-0098
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Study/Research) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Findings and methodology are presented for a cross-site analysis of the Federal Bureau of Justice Assistance’s (BJA’s) Comprehensive Communities Program (CCP), which was initiated in 1994 for the purpose of controlling crime and improving the quality of community life, with attention to gangs and youth violence.
Abstract: The strategy for achieving this purpose is based in structured partnerships and collaborations among public and private agencies. Specifically, the CCP aims to integrate the work of criminal justice and juvenile justice agencies with community-based social and economic programs that improve the quality of life of residents and neighborhoods, so as to prevent and counter crime by reducing the criminogenic conditions of family and community life. This cross-site analysis of CCP efforts had four key findings. First, the integration of police, criminal justice agencies, and other public and private agencies exceeded expectations. Second, inclusion in such efforts was not always a smooth or simple process for organizations or groups; for example, some indigenous grass-roots organizations risked being accused of abandoning their “cutting-edge reforms of public agencies." Third, neighborhoods and communities have been taken seriously, meaning that neighborhoods and communities are being viewed as the basic units for identifying and addressing problems and working for solutions. Fourth, many of the CCP program activities had a history in their respective communities, meaning that CCP funds have extended, fueled, and strengthened communities’ efforts to improve their quality of life. An important source of data for this evaluation was a self-administered survey of key participants in the CCP program in each of the initial 12 sites. In order to capture the level of involvement in community policing at each site, a questionnaire was administered at each police department. Visits were conducted at each site. 17 tables, 13 figures, 30 references, and appended data from the coalition and community policing surveys
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Interagency cooperation ; Private sector civic involvement ; Private sector-government cooperation ; Community policing ; Violence prevention ; Gang Prevention ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=266428

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.