skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244478   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Training Evaluation Model: Evaluating and Improving Criminal Justice Training
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Kelly Bradley ; Edward Connors
  Date Published: 09/2007
  Page Count: 397
  Annotation: This project produced and tested a training evaluation model that can guide evaluations of a wide range of criminal justice training programs.
  Abstract: The project adapted Donald Kirkpatrick’s training evaluation model to criminal justice training. Kirkpatrick’s model identifies four levels that successively build upon each previous level: reaction, learning, behavioral change, and results. “Reaction” refers to determining how well participants liked a training program based on rating sheets distributed at the close of a training event. “Learning” involves measuring participants’ changes in attitude, improvements in knowledge, or increases in skills or techniques. This is important because changes in behavior cannot occur if learning has not been achieved. “Behavioral change” refers to the transfer of learning at the individual level, i.e., changes in an individual’s job performance that can be attributed to the training. “Results” involves shifting the focus from the training’s impact on individual job performance to the measurable organizational results that can be attributed to the training. After explaining the features of Kirkpatrick’s model, this report presents the modified model for use with criminal justice training programs. The model that was tested includes several stages of training development that will facilitate evaluation of the training. Evaluation planning and data collection are built into the earliest stages of training development. The expanded training and evaluation model specifies tasks for conducting a needs assessment, followed by the design of a training plan, the development and testing of the curriculum, revision of the training, delivering the curriculum, and evaluating the training and trainers. Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model becomes useful in determining the l impact on trainees and their organizations. Results are presented for the testing of the model at four sites that had received discretionary grant funding for training through the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). 5 appendixes with supplementary reports and 120 references
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Models ; Criminal justice training ; Criminal justice training evaluation ; NIJ final report
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2003-DD-BX-K101
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Description
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.