skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 244534     Find in a Library
Title: Project Research to Action in Mentoring, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Sharon Johnson
Date Published: 12/2013
Page Count: 17
  Annotation: Methodology and outcomes are presented for the Project Research to Action in Mentoring, which compared the effectiveness of one-on-one mentoring to group mentoring in reducing delinquency among youth at risk for problem behaviors.
Abstract: Although the data presented do not indicate any differences in one-on-one compared to group mentoring outcomes, the sample sizes were small and implementation issues handicapped the group mentoring effort. Thus, there was more success in maintaining mentoring relationships when they were one-on-one. The project was successful in recruiting the targeted number of youth who represented varying levels of risk for delinquent behavior based on their baseline self-reported problem behaviors; however, due to challenges in maintaining matches, the sample sizes across the mentoring types, stratified by three levels of risk, were not sufficiently large to test this goal of the research. In exploring differences in long-term (12 months and 18 months) outcomes for group mentoring compared to one-on-one mentoring and risk levels, those youth who were assessed at 18 months, when the mentoring relationship had ended, did not differ in their scores from baseline, indicating that no significant changes had occurred. The sample size was too small to conduct analyses across mentoring type and risk levels. The project was a collaborative effort between the University of Missouri-St. Louis, Alliance for Families & Communities Affected by Incarceration (AFCAI), and Better Family Life (BFL). AFCAI and BFL were selected due to their established community-based mentoring programs that target at-risk youth. Both agencies agreed to undertake the research study by incorporating randomization and systematic programming into their existing mentoring approaches. This report describes the research design, mentoring models, sample characteristics for youth and mentors, the matching procedure, and performance measures. Implementation issues and challenges are also discussed. 2 figures, 2 tables, and 14 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis ; Services effectiveness ; Children at risk ; Adolescents at risk ; Juvenile Mentoring Programs ; Mentoring (juvenile)
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
Grant Number: 2010-JU-FX-0114
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.