skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 245146   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Contact versus Contactless Fingerprint Data (Final Report v2)
  Document URL: PDF 
Corporate Author: Azimuth Inc.
United States of America
Date Published: 01/2014
Page Count: 116
  Annotation: This study compared the fingerprint match performance of legacy/livescan fingerprint data (collected from traditional two-dimensional contact-based fingerprint devices) and three-dimensional contactless fingerprint scanners (CFP).
Abstract: The evaluation proved to be the first quantitative demonstration by a third party that fingerprints collected under ideal conditions from contact and contactless fingerprint devices can be matched against each other in a statistically meaningful way using two-dimensional projections; however, matching contactless images to contact images provided less match performance than a set of contact images compared to one another. In addition, matching images produced from two different contactless devices provided poor results compared to currently available technologies. As one of the first research efforts to investigate the match performance and interoperability of contact and contactless fingerprint data, this work has made important first steps; however, there are many related areas or follow-up tasks that could be pursued. The dataset collection and foundational analysis should aid research and enterprise efforts to improve biometric and identity management knowledge and capabilities. The data analysis was conducted using a fingerprint dataset collected by West Virginia University (WVU). Fingerprint data were collected from 500 subjects using the devices that were compared for the study. Twenty matching runs were performed on the data collected from the devices. Matching results were analyzed and compared based on Time Accept Rate and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Fingerprint Image Quality (NFIQ) score. 72 figures and appended WVU data types and organization and WVU non-contact fingerprint collection report
Main Term(s): Police equipment
Index Term(s): Fingerprints ; Testing and measurement ; Comparative analysis ; Fingerprint image quality ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2010-IJ-CX-K024
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Test/Measurement
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.