skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 245944   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Through-the-Wall Sensors (TTWS) for Law Enforcement: Test & Evaluation (Version 1.2)
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Dr. Chad Huffman ; Jon Hayes ; Dr. Lars Ericson
  Corporate Author: ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc.
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2014
  Page Count: 123
  Annotation: This report presents the procedures and results of the testing and evaluation of commercially available through-the-wall sensors (TTWS) conducted by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Sensors and Surveillance Center of Excellence, along with a NIJ-sponsored TTWS prototype with standoff (SO) detection capabilities.
  Abstract: The four devices tested and evaluated on performance and usability were the Range-R by L-3 Communications; Xaver 100 by Camero-Tech Ltd.; Xaver 400 by Camero-Tech Ltd.; and the AKELA Standoff Through-wall Imaging Radar (ASTR) by AKELA (NIJ prototype). Overall, each device displayed strengths and weaknesses in different areas of evaluation. The Range-R and the Xaver 100 were the smallest and easiest to handle during storage, transport, and use. During “Against the Wall” (ATW) testing, in which the tested device was placed directly against a barrier, the Xaver 400 was superior at target detection; and the ASTR (NIJ prototype) was superior when setting up the device at a distance from the barrier (SO); however, the ASTIR was the only SO device tested. There were six key observations. First, larger devices tend to have more antennas and better signal processing capabilities, which improve detecting and locating targets. Second, smaller devices are more easily stored, transported, and used with a minimum of encumbrance to the operator. Third, the Xaver 400 had the best overall percent detection of the ATW devices; but is the largest and heaviest of the ATW devices; the Range-R and the Xaver 100 are more easily stored, transported, and handled. Fourth, the ASTIR is a prototype device and is the largest and most encumbering of the devices tested. Each device has strengths and weaknesses between detection, operation, and supporting activities, such as repositioning the device at the scene. Testing was done using seven different types of barrier (wall) materials. 68 tables, 50 figures, and 10 references
  Main Term(s): Police equipment
  Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Building searches ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Sensors
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2010-IJ-CX-K024
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Test/Measurement
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=268029

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.