skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 247086   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Follow the Money: How California Counties Are Spending Their Public Safety Realignment Funds
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Jeffrey Lin, Ph.D. ; Joan Petersilia, Ph.D.
  Date Published: 01/2014
  Page Count: 100
  Annotation: This study examined California counties’ spending reports and budgets to determine which counties emphasize enforcement and which emphasize treatment in their expenditure of State funds under “Realignment” (Assembly Bill 109), which shifted from the State to the counties the responsibility for managing non-violent, non-serious offenders.
  Abstract: Under Realignment legislation, the State will distribute $4.4 billion to the counties by 2016-2017 in order to assist the counties in managing offenders formerly managed by the State. Underlying this effort is the State’s attempt to reduce the number of incarcerated offenders and expand the number and quality of community-based supervision at the local level. Although the Realignment legislation directs counties to use the State fund for community-based programs, counties have retained a substantial amount of spending discretion. This study of how California counties are spending these funds found that some counties are expanding offender treatment capacities, but other counties are using these funds to enhance enforcement and control systems. The analysis of these findings determined that counties that have decided to allocate more AB 109 funds to enforcement and control generally are responding to local criminal justice needs, including high crime rates, a shortage of law enforcement personnel, and a tradition of using incarceration to punish drug offenders. Counties that favored a greater investment in offender treatment and services, on the other hand, are typified by strong electoral support for the Sheriff and relatively under-funded district attorneys and probation departments. 13 tables, 6 figures, 37 references, and appended county plan mention and depth coding, qualitative county plan coding details, univariate descriptive statistics, alternate spending unit analyses, and determination of Pre-AB 109 control orientation
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Budgets ; Intergovernmental relations ; Criminal justice system policy ; California ; County
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

James Irvine Foundation
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0002
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.