skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 247087   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Voices From the Field: How California Stakeholders View Public Safety Realignment, Working Paper
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Joan Petersilia, Ph.D.
  Date Published: 01/2014
  Page Count: 245
  Annotation: This report summarizes the results of interviews conducted with California stakeholders responsible for implementing California’s Public Safety Realignment Act (Assembly Bill 109), which shifts responsibility for managing most lower level offenders from the State to California’s 58 counties.
  Abstract: Of the 125 stakeholders interviewed - which included local police, sheriffs, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation and parole agents, victim advocates, offenders, and social-service representatives - probation officials were the most enthusiastic champions of Realignment, welcoming the Realignment legislation’s focus on rehabilitation and the diminished use of incarceration. Using State funding authorized under AB 109, probation departments have opened day reporting centers, the expanded use of risk assessment tools, and collaborated with community partners to establish quality evidence-based programs for offenders. Public defenders were also optimistic about Realignment, but were concerned about the longer county jail terms their clients face as well as the conditions under which they are housed. Prosecutors, on the other hand, generally gave Realignment negative reviews, complaining about their loss of discretion under this law. Judges had mixed opinions, although most were concerned about a loss of discretion and the increased court caseload. Law enforcement professionals, both front-line police and sheriffs varied more than any other group in their assessment of Realignment with their opinions largely influenced by local jail capacity. Sheriffs also noted that longer jail terms were challenging their ability to provide adequate medical and mental health care to inmates; jail crowding was forcing some to release offenders early. Most stakeholder interviews indicated Realignment had spawned increased collaboration at all levels of the criminal justice system, facilitating a more holistic view of offender management. A 181-item bibliography and appended list of interviewees, interview questions, determination of pre- and post-AB 109 control orientation, and overview of Public Safety Realignment
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Police attitudes ; Criminal justice system reform ; Correctional personnel attitudes ; Court personnel attitudes ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

James Irvine Foundation
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0002
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis ; Survey
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.