skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 241356 Find in a Library
Title: Untested Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases
Journal: Sexual Assault Report  Volume:16  Issue:3  Dated:January/February 2013  Pages:33,34,40-43
Author(s): Nancy Ritter
Date Published: 2013
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: Civic Research Institute, Inc
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: Civic Research Institute, Inc
4478 US Route 27
P.O. Box 585
Kingston, NJ 08528-9982
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article overviews the issue of untested sexual assault kit (SAK) evidence and presents recommendations on how best to handle the current backlog and reduce delays in the future.
Abstract: There are thousands of untested sexual assault kits (SAKs) stored in police evidence rooms, crime labs, hospitals, clinics, and rape crisis centers in the United States. However, making decisions about how best to handle all of this older, unanalyzed evidence is difficult and complicated; and these decisions affect every stakeholder, especially the victim. This article examines the issue of untested SAKs in the hands of law enforcement verse what is considered the “backlog” of SAKs awaiting testing in the nation’s crime labs; and presents policy and practice recommendations designed to improve SAK processes as they relate to which SAKs should be examined, “action research” currently being funded by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), NIJ’s project in Detroit, and actions to take in the post-testing phase. The author stresses that “delays in evidence being sent to a lab as well as delays in analyzing evidence and conducting police investigations result in delays in justice” with the potential of serial victimization or wrongful convictions. The ultimate goal is to adopt research-based practices, procedures, and protocols to move beyond the current “crisis management” approach.
Main Term(s): Evidence; Evidence collection; Evidence identification; Evidence preservation
Index Term(s): Rape evidence kits; Sexual assault
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.