U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Comparison of MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) and CPI (California Psychological Inventory) Test Profiles for Traffic Officers and Deputy Sheriffs

NCJ Number
102584
Journal
Journal of Police Science and Administration Volume: 14 Issue: 3 Dated: (September 1986) Pages: 250-258
Author(s)
G E Hargrave; D Hiatt; T W Gaffney
Date Published
1986
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This study compared personality test profiles of State traffic officers to those of sheriffs' deputies, hypothesizing that the personalities of the two types of officers would differ because of their selection for different law enforcement tasks.
Abstract
Generally, State traffic officers work independently, patrolling highways to enforce State traffic laws. Sheriffs' deputies work more interdependently in county jails, courts, and on patrol. Study subjects consisted of 249 graduates from 1 of 2 agency-affiliated municipal sheriff's academies and 442 from a highway patrol academy. On the first day of training, all classes were administered a battery of psychological tests that included the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the California Psychological Inventory. Results indicate that both officer groups have common personality characteristics that distinguish them from the general population. Both officer groups are psychologically defended, energetic, competitive, dominant, independent, achievement-oriented, spontaneous, flexible, and socially ascendant. Both groups consist of well-adjusted persons who subscribe to a traditional work ethic and show leadership potential. Deputies tended to score higher on the aforementioned variables and show less personality variations across the group. Traffic officers showed a greater range of personality variation and were somewhat more representative of the general population. Implications are drawn for the selection of law enforcement personnel for different agencies. 5 tables and 10 references.

Downloads

No download available

Availability