A major rationale for adopting a charging policy in such cases is that it will deter future battering while also emphasizing the criminal nature of the behavior. Police and prosecutors, however, may reject such a policy because of its effect on caseloads, a crisis intervention orientation to domestic violence, and a sincere belief that charging is not in the best interest of the wife and children. If police and prosecutors are to adopt a charging policy, they must find a way to balance the often conflicting objectives of punishing and deterring the batterer and aiding the victim. The laying of charges can serve as a critical entry point into the legal system and can ensure that the wife receives protection and support through the issuing and enforcement of peace bonds and restraining orders; through legal and emotional counseling within the system; and through assistance in obtaining a separation or divorce, child custody, and financial support. The justice system also can order treatment for the offender. As a result of a study in Ontario, Canada, that showed that charges were rarely laid and that battered women most desired therapy for the batterers and legal and financial assistance for themselves, a charging policy was designed that emphasized using the legal system as an avenue for providing a variety of victim services.