U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Sentencing Severity With Mock Jurors - Predictive Validity of Three Variable Categories

NCJ Number
105132
Journal
Behavioral Sciences and the Law Volume: 3 Issue: 4 Dated: (Autumn 1985) Pages: 467-473
Author(s)
Y H Osborne; N B Rappaport
Date Published
1985
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This study assessed the influence of the following variables on mock jurors' sentencing severity: premeditated vs. unpremeditated murder, black vs. white defendant, and low socioeconomic status (SES) defendant vs. a high SES defendant.
Abstract
A total of 193 white undergraduate college students (60 percent female and 40 percent male) at Louisiana State University volunteered for the study. All subjects participated in small groups ranging in size from 12 to 18. Subjects completed demographic information forms and instruments that measured belief in a just world, religious dogmatism, and locus of control. Each subject read a written summary of a murder, with variances in defendant SES, defendant race, and type of murder. Each subject decided how many years of imprisonment to recommend for the defendant. Only defendant SES predicted sentencing severity; low SES defendants were given significantly longer sentences than high SES defendants. None of the measures of juror characteristics correlated with sentencing severity. Failure to replicate significant relationships between most of the variables and sentencing severity suggests that studies which manipulate only one variable dimension may overestimate the influence of these variables in mock jurors' decisions. 2 tables and 35 references.

Downloads

No download available

Availability