U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Mass Round-Up Urinalysis and Original Intent

NCJ Number
106932
Journal
Nova Law Review Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Dated: (Winter 1987) Pages: 733-750
Author(s)
R L Stone
Date Published
1987
Length
18 pages
Annotation
This article summarizes approximately 15 court cases that have considered the constitutionality of 'mass-round-up urinalysis' in the drug testing of public employees.
Abstract
Among Federal and State courts that have considered such cases, a consensus has emerged. All courts which have ruled upon the validity of urine tests for public employees have required as a prerequisite some articulable basis for suspecting that the employee was using illegal drugs, usually framed as 'reasonable suspicion.' The decision as to whether a given search or seizure is reasonable requires a balancing of the need to search against the intrusiveness of a particular kind of search. Before invoking the protection of the fourth amendment, one must have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the expectation of privacy is reasonable if there is a subjective expectation of privacy and this expectation is recognized by society as reasonable. The court consensus indicates that President Reagan's Executive Order 12564 will have trouble withstanding a court challenge. This order requires that all Federal executive agencies collect and test urine from all Federal employees in 'sensitive' positions. 72 footnotes.

Downloads

No download available

Availability