Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

NCJ Number:	108122

Title:	Tools for Structuring Court Discretion: What Do They Work For and Why Don't They Work Better?

Journal:	Criminal Justice Policy Review Volume:1 Issue:3 Dated:(October 1986) Pages:268-285

Author(s):	S D Gottfredson; D M Gottfredson

Date Published:	1986

Page Count:	18

Format:	Article

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America

Annotation:	This article reviews studies of the effectiveness of bail and sentencing guidelines for judicial decisionmaking.

Abstract:	The study of the Philadelphia bail project and a number of sentencing guideline studies are reviewed. The review indicates that decisionmakers tend to rely on a few common items of information regardless of the decision being made. Descriptive (based on past decisions) and normative (based on selected criteria) studies apparently recommend different items of information as predictive of offender behavioral outcomes. The evidence indicates that criminal justice decisionmakers do not make optimal decisions in predicting offender behaviors. Still, a number of factors have some predictive validity across a variety of settings, and decisionmakers do not focus on these factors. Despite substantial base rate problems, most guidelines have yielded prediction that exceeds the chance rate. The evaluations of guidelines effectiveness often ignore the dependence of guidelines effectiveness on proper development and implementation. Fundamental conflicts between normative and descriptive models, however, may constrain effectiveness in many applications of guidelines. 5 notes and 42-item bibliography. (Author abstract modified)

Main Term(s):	Judicial discretion

Index Term(s):	Bail/Financial Release; Sentencing guidelines



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=108122

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library