U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Crime, Popular Mythology, and Personal Responsibility

NCJ Number
112932
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 52 Issue: 1 Dated: (March 1988) Pages: 18-26
Author(s)
G D Walters; T W White
Date Published
1988
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This article defines and discusses lifestyle criminality in terms of four primary personal characteristics: irresponsibility, self-indulgence, interpersonal intrusiveness, and social rule-breaking.
Abstract
These four characteristics interact in a multiplicative fashion to result in a lifestyle that often includes criminal justice system involvement. A survey of 27 criminal justice experts, 97 inmates, and 32 adults in the general population revealed considerable consensus in their perceptions of the causes of criminality. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, there is no evidence to support genetic, substance abuse, mental illness, psychological conflict/stress, peer influence, poverty, lack of education or job skills, or biopsychosocial causal models of criminality. Findings regarding such explanations have been mixed, and most research has been correlational, making causal statements inappropriate. Criminal justice experts were more likely to ascribe to biopsychosocial explanations, while inmates and adults were more likely to cite greed or personal choice as explanations. It is argued that the source of crime is personal choice, not genes, poverty, or trauma. While the four characteristics define lifestyle criminality, they are the personal choice and responsibility of the offender. 55 references.