U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Treating Patients With Communicable Diseases: Limiting Liability for Physicians and Safeguarding the Public Health

NCJ Number
117451
Journal
Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume: 32 Issue: 1 Dated: (Fall 1987) Pages: 75-101
Author(s)
H A Rosencranz; W G Lavey
Date Published
1987
Length
27 pages
Annotation
This article analyzes the approach adopted by physicians and public health officials to treat two communicable diseases, tuberculosis (TB) and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), evaluating the risks imposed on other people when potentially infectious persons are not confined to a medical facility, the basis in tort law for holding physicians liable to newly infected people, and the costs and benefits of extending physician liability to subsequently infected persons.
Abstract
The article first provides two examples of a physician's treatment of patients with communicable diseases who may remain infectious to other people. It then discusses precedent in tort law regarding physicians' liability to nonpatients for the treatment and subsequent conduct of patients. The concluding section describes recommendations for physician conduct and for a legal standard regarding physician liability to nonpatients. The article concludes that the spread of a communicable disease presents a serious threat of litigation against the physician who treats the patient with that disease. It urges public health departments and physicians to adopt procedures limiting their potential liability and raising safeguards for the public health, including close supervision of TB victims who fail to comply with prescribed treatments and individual warnings to identifiable people who risk contracting TB or AIDS. The article further suggests that courts limit physicians' liability to newly infected people, possibly by making clear that concerns about patients' rights (including confidentiality) dictate against certain potential safeguards for nonpatients. 110 footnotes.

Downloads

No download available

Availability