U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Section 3: Gambling Law and Law Enforcement -- Recent Amendments to Canadian Lottery and Gaming Laws: The Transfer of Power From Federal to Provincial Governments (From Gambling in Canada: Golden Goose or Trojan Horse?, P 127-147, 1989, Colin S. Campbell and John Lowman, eds. -- See NCJ-126295)

NCJ Number
126303
Author(s)
J A Osborne; C S Campbell
Date Published
1989
Length
21 pages
Annotation
This chapter reviews the 1985 passage of the Canadian Criminal Code (Lotteries) amendment Act, which made significant changes to the existing laws. The implications of the amendments and the actual process reflect on the law reform, the criminal law, and the constitutional law in Canada.
Abstract
While Canadian gambling laws originated in English statute law dating back several centuries, the only revisions made in the 1953 edition of the Criminal Code were definitional. However, several years later it became legal for provincial governments to operate lotteries and to authorize their operation under the auspices of religious or charitable organizations. As a result of the 1985 amendment, the Federal government has been divested of any capacity to conduct lotteries and provincial authority has been expanded. The amendment was based on contractual criminal law and reformed the law through an executive, rather than legislative, process. This resulted from the transformation of gambling law into a matter of Federal-provincial relations which are characterized by the dominance of the respective executive branches. Similarly, the Federal-provincial negotiations related to gaming and lotteries were conducted through the virtual exclusion of the legislatures. This process has raised questions regarding the constitutionality of the transfer of power between Federal and provincial governments in this area. However, court decisions have affirmed a policy of constitutional flexibility by defining the limits of concepts including Federal-provincial interdelegation and referential conditional legislation. 28 references

Downloads

No download available

Availability