U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Unprincipled Punishment of Repeat Offenders: A Critique of California's Habitual Criminal Statute

NCJ Number
133179
Journal
Stanford Law Review Volume: 43 Issue: 1 Dated: (November 1990) Pages: 193- 240
Author(s)
M D Dubber
Date Published
1990
Length
48 pages
Annotation
Among the most noteworthy of modern recidivist statutes is the California Habitual Criminal Statute, however, some revisions are needed.
Abstract
This statute, the harshest of California's many recidivist provisions, enhances by five years the sentence of an offender convicted of a "serious felony" for each prior conviction of such a felony. It does not grant the sentencing judge the discretion to disregard a prior serious felony conviction for enhancement purposes, and covers offenses ranging from burglary to first degree murder. One of the statute's gravest defects is its failure to limit penalty enhancements to those offenders who have proven exceptionally likely to commit further crimes. Instead, it imposes penalty enhancements on all recidivists who commit enhanceable offenses. A more enlightened statute would have a two-tiered approach that considers both the nature of the crimes committed by an offender; and the likelihood that the particular offender will commit certain further crimes. The list of offenses should be determined on the basis of two factors: the seriousness of prior and principal crimes and the likelihood of recidivism associated with each crime. 304 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability