While recognizing the legitimacy of this practice, the Commission calls for extreme caution in granting immunity. Immunity should be granted only when it meets the criteria of furthering the public interest by strengthening a prosecution, gaining information about particular crimes, protecting the public or an individual from imminent danger, or helping to settle a labor dispute or quell civil unrest. The granting of immunity must be morally as well as legally acceptable. It is morally acceptable if it is genuinely made in the public interest, does not involve commercialization and improper trading in justice, is made for legitimate ends, and balances means and ends. Some of the reform proposals recommended by the Commission are suitable for legislative implementation, while others are more appropriate for adoption as uniform guidelines. The recommendations cover the definition of an immunity agreement, the authority to provide immunity, factors to consider when granting immunity, conduct in respect of immunity agreements, the form and contents of such agreements, prerequisites to the use of an immunized person's evidence, the enforcement of immunity, and the exclusion of evidence. Finally, the Attorney General of Canada would be required to submit an annual report regarding the use of immunity agreements. 400 notes