U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Maricopa County Demand Reduction Program: An Evaluation Report

NCJ Number
138225
Author(s)
J R Hepburn; C W Johnston; S Rogers
Date Published
1992
Length
226 pages
Annotation
The 1989 national drug control strategy was designed to bring legal and social sanctions to bear against drug users in general, with a particular focus on recreational and occasional drug users. The Maricopa County (Arizona) Demand Reduction Program, initiated in the same year, is being touted as a model program for targeting casual drug users. Data set archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, located at URL http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/nacjd.
Abstract
The specific goals of the program are to promote a community-based commitment toward achieving a drug-free county; increase public awareness of the consequences of drug use; assist employers in creating drug-free workplaces; develop and incorporate educational programs; identify and target illegal drug users for enhanced law enforcement efforts; and provide low-cost counseling and treatment programs for drug users. The components of this user accountability program cover heightened law enforcement, increased prosecution, and diversion to treatment. This evaluation discusses police implementation and support of the program, program impact on case processing and outcomes, determinants of prosecutorial decisionmaking in the program, and program impact on recidivism. The assessment indicates that the Maricopa County program has succeeded in establishing a high publicity profile for itself, meeting its objective of net widening, expanding the use of diversion to treatment, generating funds through fees collected from persons who opt for treatment, and slowing the return to recidivism of program participants. 22 figures, 28 tables, and 5 appendixes