Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

NCJ Number:	141597

Title:	REVIEW OF DEATH PENALTY CASELAW: FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR PROGRAM EVALUATION

Journal:	Criminal Justice Policy Review Volume:5 Issue:2 Dated:(June 1991) Pages:114-120

Author(s):	M A Small

Date Published:	1991

Annotation:	The death penalty has been under increasing empirical study since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Furman v. Georgia, and this paper reviews empirical challenges to the death penalty from the program evaluation perspective.

Abstract:	In recent years, the Supreme Court has narrowed both the relevance and the applicability of empirical evidence in deciding capital punishment cases. Trends in death penalty litigation suggest that the Supreme Court is simply fine- tuning the "death program," focusing on fairness of procedures and deferring the more difficult moral questions to State legislatures. A brief historical analysis of death penalty cases offers guidance to those interested in empirically examining nuances of the death penalty program. The Supreme Court's opinion in Gregg v. Georgia demonstrated that the death penalty is constitutional, while the McCleskey v. Kemp opinion all but closed the door to arguments that death penalty implementation is flawed. The case of Ford v. Wainright argued unsuccessfully that certain death row inmates should not be executed. In Penry v. Lynaugh, the Supreme Court determined that the execution of mentally retarded persons is not unconstitutional. The Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. Kentucky ruled that the death penalty can be applied to juveniles. The author concludes that the collection of empirical data to challenge the death penalty's constitutionality is largely relegated to State legislative reform or State constitutional challenges. 2 references

Main Term(s):	Capital punishment

Index Term(s):	Death row inmates; Juvenile capital punishment; Offenders with Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities; US Supreme Court decisions

Page Count:	7

Format:	Article

Type:	Legislation/Policy Analysis

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=141597

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library