U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Effect of Prejudice and Judicial Ambiguity on Defendant Guilt Ratings

NCJ Number
149491
Journal
Journal of Social Psychology Volume: 133 Issue: 5 Dated: (October 1993) Pages: 651-659
Author(s)
N A Rector; R M Bagby; R Nicholson
Date Published
1993
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This study examined the joint effects of defendant and victim characteristics and the presence or absence of the legal standard on jury decisionmaking. Specifically, the study explored whether jurors hold prejudicial attitudes toward defendants and victims and whether those attitudes influence guilty determination.
Abstract
Respondents included 245 university undergraduates who were randomly assigned to one of 18 conditions and asked to assume the role of juror. They read a segment of a transcript describing a rape trial (race of defendant and victim varied between scenarios) and were asked to rate both victim and defendant on 16 adjective scales and to determine the defendant's guilt or innocence. The results showed little evidence to suggest prejudicial attitudes toward the defendant and victim based solely on race and independent of the judicial conditions. While black defendants were rated lower in overall appeal, additional adjective-rating factors scores did not differ according to race. The overall perception of the defendant and victim did play a mediating role in jury decisionmaking; if the victim was attractive, the defendant was more likely to be convicted, and vice-versa. 3 tables and 17 references

Downloads

No download available

Availability