In general, the Commission finds the various benefit claims for intermediate sanctions made across the country to be valid, saving taxpayers dollars, relieving overcrowding or conserving space for the more serious offender. In addition, fairness is enhanced by having the appropriate sanctions available. An effective program of intermediate punishments must have public safety and offender accountability as primary concerns. It is also important to address the work ethic and victim concerns through restitution payments and public service work (community service). The Introduction to the report includes a summary of the Commission's history and mandate, a description of guidelines, current sentencing options, and perspectives on the need and benefits of intermediate punishment. There are also sections on the project's mission and principles; a project overview and evaluation; model development and recommendations. Footnotes, attachments. references, tables