The court held that the ordinance unconstitutionally interfered with minors' right to free movement and right to due process, and violated the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment. The court also adopted the three-factor test laid out by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bellotti v. Baird, which involved a minor's right to have an abortion without parental consent, to determine when a minor's constitutional rights may not be coextensive with those of an adult. This article addresses the constitutionality of curfews imposed against adults, analyzes the source and scope of the right to travel and freedom of personal mobility, describes how the Supreme Court has differentiated juveniles' rights from adults' rights, and explores inconsistencies in the application of the Bellotti standard. The article concludes that juvenile curfews should be upheld when there are sufficient State interests to justify the infringement of minors' fundamental rights. 227 notes