This report examines the results of those two surveys and makes comparisons where appropriate. The first two sections compare the methodologies, and strengths and weaknesses of the UCR approach versus that of the victimization survey, and discusses the assumptions made when comparing statistical results. The statistics presented in the two reports are compared for rape, robbery, assault, and burglary/larceny-theft. The results of Hawaii's first comprehensive crime victimization survey are difficult to interpret; the percentage and number of crimes that apparently go unreported is shocking. Results of this comparison raise questions about the accuracy and reliability of both sources of data. 12 tables, 4 notes, and 24 references