U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Peru: The Two Faces of Justice

NCJ Number
161080
Author(s)
R Kirk
Date Published
1995
Length
52 pages
Annotation
This paper assesses Peru's judicial system from a human rights perspective and recommends changes.
Abstract
Having shut down the Congress and courts and assumed extraordinary powers on April 5, 1992, Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori decreed new, broad definitions for terrorism and treason, a punitive and life-threatening prison regime for those accused, and a dual system of "faceless" courts, some civilian and some military, whose procedures deny the accused the most basic due process rights. The current system provides for secret trials by prosecutors and judges whose identities are never revealed (faceless courts). These trials violate the international obligation of the state to provide an independent and impartial tribunal. Incommunicado police detention is permitted for 15 days for those suspected of either terrorism or treason; this may be extended to 30 days on request by police. Police routinely torture those accused of terrorism or treason, and testimony gained through torture is regularly used at trial. The newly defined crime of terrorism violates freedom of expression by criminalizing acts such as "provoking anxiety," "affecting international relations," or seeming to favor or excuse the behavior of suspected guerrillas. Access to counsel is severely restricted. Among the recommendations offered in this report are an end to military jurisdiction over crimes committed by civilians, an end to secret military trials for military and police officers accused of committing human rights violations, and the elimination of lengthy incommunicado detention. Overall, Peru must guarantee the independence of the judiciary by ensuring that those appointed to the country's courts and prosecutors' offices are free from political pressure. Peru should also reform the terrorism law and appoint an independent judicial body to review all cases adjudicated since 1992. A list of reforms are suggested to prevent the jailing of more innocent people. 299 footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability