U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Heavy Drinking in a Population of Methadone-Maintained Clients

NCJ Number
161213
Journal
Journal of Studies on Alcohol Volume: 56 Issue: 4 Dated: (July 1995) Pages: 417-422
Author(s)
L R Chatham; G A Rowan-Szal; G W Joe; B S Brown; D D Simpson
Date Published
1995
Length
6 pages
Annotation
This study clarified the relationship between heavy alcohol use and response to methadone treatment using a sample of 79 clients who showed three or more DSM-III-R symptoms and a comparison group of 108 heavy drinking clients with less than three alcohol dependency symptoms on admitting characteristics and on tenure in treatment.
Abstract
The sample consisted of injecting heroin addicts admitted between April 1990 and January 1993 to public methadone treatment programs in Corpus Christi, Dallas, and Houston. These clients were admitted to treatment as part of the Drug Abuse Treatment for AIDS-Risk Reduction Project funded to improve treatment retention, reduce drug abuse relapse rates, and improve the psychosocial adjustment of injecting drug users through enhanced intervention strategies. As expected, clients meeting DSM-III-R criteria were significantly more likely to show evidence of psychological problems and dysfunction in family and peer relations at admission. An unexpected finding was that these clients were also more likely to remain in treatment longer than drinking clients who did not report dependency. Alcohol dependent clients were significantly more likely to have poor experiences with self-help groups, which may have reflected less denial and relatively better ability to focus in opiate dependency problems. The authors conclude that failure to differentiate between alcohol dependent and nondependent groups of drinkers enrolled in methadone treatment may partially account for reported differences in treatment outcome studies and may help clinicians plan more effective treatment approaches. 33 references and 1 tables