U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Coordinating Investigations of Child Abuse: APWA and the Police Foundation Have Developed Guidelines for Collaboration Between Law Enforcement and Child Protection Agencies

NCJ Number
164402
Journal
Mississippi Voices for Children & Youth Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Dated: (March-April 1996) Pages: 21-25
Author(s)
D I Sheppard; P A Zangrillo
Date Published
1996
Length
5 pages
Annotation
The American Public Welfare Association and the Police Foundation conducted a study of law enforcement and child protection service (CPS) agencies in 1991 and 1992 to determine how law enforcement and CPS could improve joint investigations of child abuse cases and to identify program models that could facilitate cooperation.
Abstract
The study had three main objectives: (1) examine joint investigations at the local level by conducting a national survey of law enforcement and CPS agencies; (2) identify elements of effective joint investigations by studying innovative cooperative programs in selected localities; and (3) develop joint investigation program models to enhance existing programs. Surveys were sent to law enforcement and CPS agencies, and responses were received from 325 municipal police agencies, 179 county law enforcement agencies, and 239 CPS agencies. In addition to the surveys, case studies were conducted in seven counties (Texas, Indiana, Washington, Alabama, Maryland, and California). It was found that 80 percent of police agencies and 95 percent of sheriff departments conducted joint investigations with local CPS agencies. CPS agencies reported that 20 percent of child maltreatment allegations they investigated in fiscal year 1991 were joint investigations with law enforcement. Interagency agreements between law enforcement and CPS agencies typically contained provisions for notification and reporting responsibilities of team members, criteria for joint investigations, interviews within the investigation, and the geographic area served by the team. Survey findings and case studies were used to develop guidelines for three model joint investigation programs: model based on existing agency personnel and resources; model offering a multidisciplinary interview center to facilitate victim interviews; and model using a comprehensive child advocacy center for more effective joint investigations. Benefits of joint versus independent child abuse investigations are noted.