skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 164509     Find in a Library
Title: LEAA/OJP (Law Enforcement Assistance Administration/Office of Justice Programs) Retrospective: Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
Corporate Author: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 25
  Annotation: This report presents a summary of the observations offered by current and former Federal officials involved in the work of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) and its successor, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), at a one-day meeting on July 11, 1996; observations pertain to lessons learned over 30 years regarding how government can best address the problems of crime in the Nation.
Abstract: Participants agreed that the OJP should set priorities based on the knowledge that criminal justice agencies alone cannot solve crime problems. Further, OJP should strengthen its emphasis on planning and enlist agency and community representatives at the State and local levels to help shape the OJP agenda. Meeting participants recommended that OJP should be organized as a single agency, since it is difficult to achieve consistency and continuity in programming under its current fragmented statutory structure. Based on their collective experience and knowledge, the majority of meeting participants agreed that one of the most important OJP roles is to assist and more vigorously oversee State and local criminal justice planning. Staff should be planning experts, and OJP should provide a well-developed technical assistance program. Also, OJP should emphasize research, evaluation, and development. OJP should sponsor more "tier one" research and evaluation, demonstrate intellectual leadership, and convince the Congress of the importance of such research. Further, OJP should improve the flow of information to the public, to State and local agencies, and to the Congress, as well as use discretionary grants to encourage experimental approaches, help support programs that have proven effective, and fill in the gaps in State programming. An attendee list is provided.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Federal aid ; Law Enforcement Assistance Admininstration (LEAA) ; Federal programs ; Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.