skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 181874 Find in a Library
Title: Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems
Journal: Crime and Delinquency  Volume:46  Issue:2  Dated:April 2000  Pages:181-193
Author(s): David Weisburd
Date Published: April 2000
Page Count: 13
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article focuses on factors that have traditionally inhibited the use of randomized experiments as a tool for developing criminal justice policy.
Abstract: Experimental designs are not appropriate for every evaluation study in criminal justice. Nonetheless, experiments are possible in many circumstances and can provide a powerful tool for developing criminal justice policy. There is no reason to exclude experimental designs at the outset, either for ethical, political, or practical reasons, although this is often the case in criminal justice study. The task is to identify under what conditions experiments can be successfully implemented. This article develops eight principles that may help researchers and practitioners assess when experimentation will be most feasible. First, there are generally fewer ethical barriers to experimentation when interventions involve the addition of resources; and second, there are generally fewer objections to experiments that test sanctions that are more lenient than existing criminal justice penalties. Third, experiments with lower public visibility will generally be easier to implement. Fourth, in cases in which treatment cannot be given to all eligible subjects, there is likely to be less resistance to random allocation. Fifth, randomized experiments are likely to be easier to develop if the subjects of intervention represent less serious threats to community safety. Sixth, experimentation will be more difficult to implement when experimenters try to limit the discretion of criminal justice agents who traditionally act with significant autonomy and authority. Seventh, it will be easier to develop randomized experiments in systems in which there is a high degree of hierarchical control. Finally, when treatments are relatively complex, involving multiple actions on the part of criminal justice agents, experiments can become prohibitively cumbersome and expensive. 26 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Criminal justice research; Evaluative research; Research design; Research methods
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=181874

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.