skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 181942     Find in a Library
  Title: Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective From Nine State Criminal Trial Courts, Research in Brief
  Document URL: Text PDF 
  Author(s): Brian J. Ostrom ; Roger A. Hanson
  Date Published: 06/2000
  Page Count: 12
  Series: NIJ Research in Brief
  Annotation: This study identified factors that influenced the timeliness and quality of felony case processing in State criminal court systems in Albuquerque, N.M.; Birmingham, Ala.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Grand Rapids, Mich.; Hackensack, N.J.; Oakland, Calif.; Portland, Ore.; and Sacramento, Calif.
  Abstract: In each jurisdiction, researchers analyzed approximately 400 felony cases that reached resolution in 1994. To test the influence of factors believed to affect case processing time, the study measured the relative impact of each factor, alone and in combination, within and across all jurisdictions. Researchers also interviewed and surveyed judges, attorneys, and other court officials to ascertain attitudes toward court resources, management, and the skills and tactics of opposing counsel. Researchers then compared these opinions with the overall processing speed of their respective jurisdictions. The study found that meaningful and effective advocacy was more likely to occur in criminal justice systems where case resolution was the most timely. The relative pace of litigation depended largely on the local legal culture, i.e., the expectations and attitudes of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. In the more expeditious courts, personnel had more efficient work orientations, including clear case processing time goals. Attorneys in these courts had more positive views about resources, management policies, and the skill and tactics of their opposition than did their counterparts in less expeditious courts. The combined influence of four factors -- a violent felony charge, the issuance of a bench warrant, pretrial release on bond, and resolution by trial -- produced a significant increase in case processing time in all nine courts. The study concludes that all courts can become more efficient by maximizing attorney skills, management techniques, and available technology. Increases in efficiency will simultaneously improve the timeliness and quality of felony case processing. 4 exhibits and 16 notes
  Main Term(s): Court management
  Index Term(s): Court personnel ; Court case flow management ; Court case flow ; Case processing ; Court personnel attitudes
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

State Justice Institute
United States of America
  Grant Number: 94-IJ-CX-0003
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.