skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 182504   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage: A Report on Community Justice Initiatives
  Document URL: HTML Text PDF 
Author(s): John S. Goldcamp ; Cheryl Irons-Guynn
Corporate Author: Crime and Justice Research Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 04/2000
Page Count: 126
  Series: BJA Monographs
  Annotation: This report describes the emergence of the mental health court strategy in four jurisdictions that have pioneered the concept: Broward County (Fla.); King County (Wash.); Anchorage, Alas.; and San Bernardino, Calif.
Abstract: The immediate pressures that have led to the development of the mental health court strategy include crises in community mental health care, the drug epidemic of the 1980’s and 1990’s, the major increase in homelessness over the last 2 decades, and widespread jail overcrowding. Each of the mental health court jurisdictions has responded to both the problems experienced by persons with mental illness in overcrowded jails and the relatively common co-occurrence of mental illness among the large numbers of drug abusers in the criminal justice populations. Common features of the four mental health courts are that they are voluntary, and they accept only persons with demonstrable mental illness likely to have contributed to their involvement in the criminal justice system. They share the objective of preventing the jailing of the mentally ill and/or of securing their release from jail to appropriate services and support in the community. Each court gives a high priority to concerns for public safety in arranging for the care of mentally ill offenders in the community. The four courts differ from each other in important respects. The issues raised by the emergence of this court model include early identification of candidates for the mental health court, conflict between criminal justice and mental health treatment goals, definitions of success, and others. These courts represent important court-based community justice initiatives, are strengthening the effectiveness of community mental health treatment approaches by offering their close attention and supervision, and are returning mentally ill persons from criminal justice processing to the community to function there. Figures, footnotes, and 34 references
Main Term(s): Alternative court procedures
Index Term(s): Mentally ill offenders ; Court reform ; Mental health services ; Offender mental health services ; Florida ; Washington ; Alaska ; California
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-DD-BX-K008
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Crime and Justice Research Institute
520 N. Columbus Blvd., Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19123
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.