U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Consensus and Contradictions in Understanding Domestic Violence: Implications for Policy and Model Programs (From Violence in Homes and Communities: Prevention, Intervention, and Treatment, P 245-267, 1999, Thomas P. Gullotta and Sandra J. McElhaney, eds. -- See NCJ-182594)

NCJ Number
182600
Author(s)
Pamela Jenkins; Barbara Davidson
Date Published
1999
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This chapter examines some of the more commonly held assumptions about domestic violence and their impact on what has been considered “best practice” policies and programs.
Abstract
The chapter discusses model programs that embrace, to some degree, some of the following assumptions about domestic violence: (1) Everyone defines the problem of domestic violence in the same way; (2) The solution for women who are victims of domestic violence is to leave the situation; (3) Any woman who is battered can go to a shelter; (4) If the criminal justice system would do its job properly, women would be safe; and (5) Medical, mental health and social services personnel routinely recognize the signs of abuse and identify battered women who seek their services. The chapter discusses how these assumptions have been used, for better or worse, to develop certain solutions. Data for the chapter were derived from a variety of qualitative strategies including interviews with battered women, law enforcement and shelter workers; focus groups with law enforcement, homeless advocates and battered women’s advocates; and field notes from participation observation at law enforcement training and domestic violence coordinating councils. References

Downloads

No download available

Availability