U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Should Partial Identifications Be Accepted in Police Lineups? (From Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Crime and Criminology, Fifth Edition, P 244-271, 1998, Richard C. Monk, ed. -- See NCJ-183062)

NCJ Number
183076
Author(s)
A. M. Levi; Noam Jungman; Michael R. Leippe; Gary L. Wells
Editor(s)
Richard C. Monk
Date Published
1998
Length
28 pages
Annotation
Two Israeli police officials identify serious flaws in existing police line-up procedures and proposed novel remedies such as the allowance of partial identifications, while two psychologists reject key aspects of the partial identification proposal as unrealistic and untested.
Abstract
The Israeli police officials believe that police line-ups constitute an essential tool of justice but remain dangerous. Problems include the over-belief in line-up identifications, the all-or-none nature of the line-up, similarity of foils to the suspect, similarity of innocent suspects to the offender, failure to choose the offender, and the small size of the line-up. A method is proposed that would have witnesses view more than 100 foils, have them choose foils by their own judgment of similarity to the offender, and allow multiple choices from the line-up. In criticizing the method, the two psychologists note that eyewitness identification of suspects from line-ups and photo-spreads is the largest single cause of false imprisonment in the United States. They argue that partial identifications will solve many problems, including the tendency for courts to over-believe eyewitnesses, but that the method requires further testing to determine its efficacy.

Downloads

No download available

Availability