skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 185878     Find in a Library
  Title: What Recent Studies Do (and Don't) Tell Us About Imprisonment and Crime (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 27, P 419-494, 2000, Michael Tonry, ed. -- See NCJ-185871)
  Author(s): William Spelman
  Date Published: 2000
  Page Count: 76
  Annotation: Despite three decades of study and a nationwide quasi-experiment of unprecedented scale, it is still uncertain how large an effect prisons have on the crime rate in the United States.
  Abstract: Researchers have learned some things in the course of assessing imprisonment and the crime rate. They no longer use cross-sectional data sets because it is impossible to separate simultaneous effects. Also, researchers no longer use national time series data and ratio variables because they produce inflated estimates. Better research methods have improved the validity and narrowed the scope of recent estimates. Most studies show that doubling current U.S. prison capacity would reduce index crime rates by 20 to 40 percent. Nonetheless, some problems persist that relate to simultaneity, specification error, and difficulties in comparing among States. In the case of simultaneity, prison affects crime and crime affects prison and it is difficult to isolate one effect from the other. Specification error may involve left out variables, while difficulties in comparing among States may be related to the fact that States use prisons very differently. Perhaps most important, the range of estimates of the effect of imprisonment on crime falls in an awkward spot. At the low end, further prison construction is probably not cost-effective. At the high end, further prison construction is very likely cost-effective. Further research is recommended on the cost-effectiveness of alternatives to prison, especially in the context of scarce resources. An appendix lists variables included in crime equations. 109 references, 7 footnotes, 4 tables, and 2 figures
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Research methods ; Incarceration and Imprisonment ; Crime costs ; Cost effectiveness analysis ; Crime Rate ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Prison construction ; Corrections costs ; Corrections research ; United States of America
  Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
Publicity Director
5801 Ellis Avenue
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60637-1496
United States of America
  Type: Collected Work
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.