In principle, there are two potentially complementary outcomes of State crime control, external control and internal control initiatives. External control initiatives that demand, impose, or legislate more control over State agencies may be met with three possible responses from State agents--resistance, public relations, and internal controls. Attempts by the government or outsiders to control State crime often result in cover-ups and obstruction of justice. Internal control initiatives may carry more weight than external control initiatives, and controls directed at individuals may be more effective than those involving the entire organization. In addition, legal mechanisms serve to control State crime since most democracies are bound by constitutions, the rule of law, and a system of checks and balances in government. The author indicates that more theoretically-informed case studies of other advanced industrialized countries and non-democratic countries should continue and that appropriate policy development based on program evaluation be supported to control State crime. 1 note