skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 187109   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Impacts of Three Strikes and Truth in Sentencing on the Volume and Composition of Correctional Populations
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Elsa Chen
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 109
  Annotation: Three strikes and truth in sentencing laws have garnered a great deal of political and public support in the United States in recent years, and the effects of these laws on the correctional system are examined.
Abstract: The effects of the laws are assessed with respect to the rate of prison incarceration, the likelihood of receiving a prison sentence for a felony, the estimated time served by prison inmates, and the flow of admissions to and releases from prison. Given limits on prison capacities, the author believes policies that send more inmates to prison or that require longer terms may require the displacement of other inmates to alternative forms of supervision. The effects of the laws are estimated nationwide, with emphasis on California and Washington. The analysis shows three strikes laws have had very limited effects in California. The combination of three strikes and truth in sentencing laws has affected the proportion of prison inmates over 50 years of age. In Washington, there appears to be some reductions in the growth of parole entries and exits associated with three strikes laws. The lack of significant effects of three strikes laws nationally is attributed in large part to the fact that the laws are very rarely used in most States. Overall, both three strikes and truth in sentencing laws have had few observable short-term effects on the volume and composition of correctional populations, but there appears to be evidence of a longer term effect of truth in sentencing laws in Washington compared to other States. Appendixes provide supplemental data on the analysis of the laws, along with the analysis methodology and data sources. References, tables, and figures
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; Inmate statistics ; Corrections statistics ; State laws ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Three Strikes Laws ; Washington ; California ; United States of America
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0082
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.