skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 192549     Find in a Library
Title: Purposes, Practices, and Problems of Supermax Prisons (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 28, P 385-434, 2001, Michael Tonry, ed. -- See NCJ-192542)
Author(s): Leena Kurki ; Norval Morris
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 40
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 90-IJ-CX-K044
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This essay provides an overview of the evolution of supermax prisons in the United States focusing on their intent, facility and program characteristics, and controversies facing the treatment, services, and cost of such facilities.
Abstract: As of 1999, 34 States were providing an estimated total of 19,630 supermax beds. Supermax prisons are facilities or units designated for inmates who have been disruptive or violent while incarcerated and where their behavior is controlled only by separation, restricted movement, and limited direct access to staff and other inmates. This environment excludes routine disciplinary segregation, protective custody, and other routine purposes. Supermax prisons have at least four characteristics: (1) assignment to a supermax prison is long-term, indefinite, and possibly for the rest of the inmate's life; (2) administrative admission and transfer criteria and procedures sometimes allow wide discretion to the prison administration and not need to provide due process protection; (3) several supermaxes maintain regimes characterized by almost complete isolation and deprivation of environmental stimuli; and (4) supermaxes are characterized as having extremely limited or no programmed activities. The exclusive goals of supermaxes are related to safety and security with its main purpose to separate the most disruptive inmates. This essay raises a number of policy and research questions about supermax prisons. However, there is limited research on the operation and effects of inmates, staff, and other prisons. The essay is organized into six sections. Section I set the frame of reference to consider the evolution of the supermax prison. In Section II, a description of the regime at the Tamms supermax facility in Illinois is provided. Section III compares some of the Tamms characteristics to those observed by Human Rights Watch and Federal district court judges in other supermax prisons. In Section IV, a concentration and focus is on the mentally ill prisoners and the psychiatric effects of solitary confinement. Section V briefly discusses order maintenance in prisons, and in Section VI a summary of the supermax movement is presented. The overall thought is that the safety and security of an effective and evenhanded prison regime do not require the harsh and isolated conditions of punishment typically found in most supermax prisons. References
Main Term(s): Maximum security
Index Term(s): Solitary confinement ; Correctional institutions (adult) ; Construction costs ; Prison costs ; Prison management ; Inmate misconduct
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=192549

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.