skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 192996   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Process Evaluation of Tier 4 Connecticut: Department of Correction Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Susan E. Pease Ph.D. ; Raymond C. Tafrate Ph.D. ; Stephen M. Cox Ph.D.
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 95
  Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings of an evaluation that examined the various components of three residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) programs within the Connecticut Department of Correction.
Abstract: Both qualitative and quantitative methods of evaluation were used to explore program structure, staffing, selection of participants, program content, and preliminary outcomes. The results of this study established baseline measures for the NIJ-funded outcome evaluation of these programs. All three programs were designed around a modified therapeutic community model; however, there were some differences in procedures, housing, interaction with the general inmate population, and inmate-staff relations. One consistent finding was the importance of cooperation and sensitivity from custody staff in supporting treatment goals. Although many of the interactions between custody and counseling staff were positive, the rotation of custody staff in and out of the therapeutic communities resulted in inconsistent rewards and punishment for participant behaviors. Additionally, there was significant variability in the educational backgrounds, skill levels, and treatment philosophies of the counseling staff within and across all three programs. Selection procedures among all three programs accurately selected and recruited inmates with clinically relevant drug and/or alcohol problems. These inmates also had sufficient motivation for change; however, mental health issues were not given significant attention, with many being sufficiently serious to limit individual treatment gains and possibly contribute to relapse once outside a structured environment. Treating addiction and early childhood sexual victimization in female substance abusers would be cost effective, since there is strong evidence that such treatment would reduce the likelihood of relapse. There are a number of issues that should be addressed regarding length of time in treatment, since the amount of time in the programs was shorter than the optimal program length of 9 to 12 months. All of the programs were perceived by participants as helpful in the treatment of their addictive behaviors and related issues. Ten recommendations are offered to further enhance the effectiveness of the RSAT programs. 17 tables and 94 references
Main Term(s): Inmate drug treatment
Index Term(s): Treatment/Therapeutic Community ; Program implementation ; Treatment techniques ; NIJ final report ; Connecticut
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-RT-VX-K012
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.