Arguments for the civilian oversight of police behavior are that police oversight of employee behavior tends to favor outcomes that serve a positive police image and ignore the seriousness of police misconduct; the public must be able to observe the processing of complaints against the police in order to have confidence that the process is fair; and civilian oversight helps police understand how the community views standards for police behavior. Arguments against the civilian oversight of police behavior are that it would decrease police effectiveness, demoralize officers, and interfere with the police chief's authority; civilian boards would not have subpoena power and would create due process problems for officers that appear before such boards; police organizations must be free to deal with their own organizational problems; and citizens already have access to redress of their complaints through the court system. Issues that must be addressed in any civilian oversight mechanism are the public's right of access to information regarding the complaint and the process, conciliation efforts, who determines the discipline, officers' rights during the process, who receives and investigates complaints, and the inclusion or exclusion of police officers on an oversight board. 6 notes and 5 references