skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 196397   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Dispensing Justice Locally: The Impact, Costs and Benefits of The Midtown Community Court
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Michele Sviridoff ; David B. Rottman ; Rob Weidner ; Fred Cheesman ; Richard Curtis ; Randall Hansen ; Brian J. Ostrom
  Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
  Date Published: 2002
  Page Count: 364
  Annotation: This document evaluates the Midtown Community Court demonstration project in New York City.
  Abstract: The purpose of the project was to design a community-based courthouse that would provide effective and accessible justice for quality-of-life crimes. These crimes include prostitution, shoplifting, minor drug possession, turnstile jumping, unlicensed vending, and disorderly conduct and often arise in the Times Square area and the surrounding residential neighborhoods of Clinton and Chelsea. Research was conducted in a multi-method project, designed to examine the implementation, effects, costs, and benefits of the court. The first phase of research examined the effects of the project over its first 18 months; the second reviewed overall impacts and ways for assessing costs and benefits of the project. Project planners expected impacts in four primary areas: case outcomes, compliance with intermediate sanctions, community conditions, and community attitudes. The analysis of preliminary impacts showed that, in its first 18 months, the court had substantial effects in all four areas. Results in the second phase of the research revealed that early impacts on arrest-to-arraignment time, case outcomes, and community service compliance rates were sustained over 3 years. By the third year, the court produced a higher rate of dispositions at arraignment for comparable cases than the Downtown court. There was an increase in intermediate sanctions in sentencing and marked reductions in the frequency of “time served” sentences and reductions in the frequency of jail for some charges. Aggregate community service compliance was markedly higher than Downtown. There were substantial reductions in concentrations of prostitution and unlicensed vending in Midtown early in the project. Several factors converged to produce a general improvement in neighborhood conditions, such as increased police enforcement and general economic development. There was broad consensus among the community residents that the primary quality-of-life problems of the Midtown area, particularly prostitution, had been dealt with successfully. 20 figures, 24 tables, 8 appendixes, 83 references
  Main Term(s): Model programs ; Neighborhood justice centers
  Index Term(s): Pilot cities ; Community conflict ; Effectiveness ; Program design ; Local criminal justice systems ; Access to courts ; New York
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 96-IJ-CX-0019
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=196397

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.