skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 196441     Find in a Library
Title: Emerging Roles and Responsibilities in the Reentry Partnership Initiative: New Ways of Doing Business
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): James M. Byrne Ph.D. ; Faye S. Taxman Ph.D. ; Douglas Young M.S.
Corporate Author: University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
United States of America
Date Published: 03/2002
Page Count: 34
  Annotation: This is a report on the evaluation of the Reentry Partnership Initiative (RPI) -- a Federal program that includes the formation of a partnership between criminal justice, social service, and community groups to develop and implement a re-entry process for offenders -- conducted to examine how the eight demonstration sites implemented the RPI, with a focus on the organizational development across agencies to construct new offender re-entry processes.
Abstract: The evaluation of the eight sites (Maryland, Vermont, South Carolina, Missouri, Florida, Nevada, Massachusetts, and Washington) involved qualitative research methods, including interviews, focus groups, network analysis surveys of stakeholders, and a review of documents. The evaluation focused on measuring the fidelity of the program implementation during the early stage of the RPI process. The RPI requires key criminal justice system actors (police, courts, corrections, community) to redefine their roles and responsibilities in the effort to reintegrate offenders into the community. This report initially discusses the essential characteristics of a successful re-entry program: leadership, partnership, and ownership. It advises that RPI programs will involve shared decision-making by police, institutional corrections, community corrections, and public/private service providers concerning "what to do" with offenders as they make the transition from the institution to the community. In addition to the aforementioned key actors, representatives from the community (e.g., victims, victims advocates, community boards, etc.) will also be involved in re-entry decision-making. All members of the partnership should have a voice at each of the following decision points in the re-entry process: program eligibility, institutional treatment plans, structured prerelease planning, structured re-entry, and community reintegration strategies. In presenting the findings of the evaluation, this report describes how the RPI shared decision-making strategy has changed the roles and responsibilities of each of the partnership participants in the eight demonstration sites. The RPI programs examined shared a common theme: inclusion of nontraditional partners along with improvements in system coordination will result in improved public safety. 13 notes
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Probation or parole decisionmaking ; Parolees ; Prerelease programs ; Interagency cooperation ; Community involvement ; Aftercare decisionmaking ; Parole supervision ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-IJ-CX-0045
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
4511 Knox Road
Suite 201
College Park, MD 20740
United States of America
Publisher URL: 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.