skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 198620   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Decision Making in the Juvenile Justice System: A Comparative Study of Four States
Series: NIJ Research Report
Author(s): Rosemary Sarri Ph.D. ; Jeffrey J. Shook J.D. ; Geoffrey Ward M.A. ; Mark Creekmore Ph.D. ; Cheri Albertson M.S.W ; Sara Goodkind M.S.W ; Jo Chih Soh B.A.
Corporate Author: University of Michigan
Institute for Social Research
United States of America
Date Published: 06/2001
Page Count: 363
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 98-JB-VX-0112
Sale Source: University of Michigan
Institute for Social Research
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document discusses how courts and State service agencies organize and structure the decisions that process juveniles in the juvenile justice system in four States.
Abstract: The States studied were Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana. Processing decisions and the perceptions of court personnel were compared in 12 juvenile courts in the 4 States. Decisions about case processing were examined to determine whether they could be made more rational and fair through the development and application of structured decision making related to accountability-based sanctions. Analysis of the juvenile codes in the four States identified the following trends in juvenile code changes: shifting borders, decision making for transfer, prosecutors’ authority, increased tools for juvenile court, more punitive correctional programming, justice by geography, restrictions on judicial discretion, and availability of resources. The most significant finding was the variability within and among the States with regard to the numbers of juveniles processed and the patterns of processing from initial detention through placement. This includes the various programs available for juveniles and the extent of reintegration services when they returned from institutions. The four States had a long history of juvenile courts and juvenile justice systems, beginning in the early 20th century. They exhibited tremendous variation in legislation, court structures and administration, resource structures, and community and cultural contexts, which influenced case processing and outcomes both within and between States. It is recommended that the following areas be addressed: overprocessing, minority over-representation, increasing involvement of females in the juvenile justice system, information systems, role of prosecutors, defense counsel, increasingly punitive mandates of juvenile codes, structured decision making and the service continuum, accountability, community involvement, specialty courts, judicial leadership, and human rights. 67 tables, 13 figures, 4 appendices
Main Term(s): State juvenile justice systems ; Juvenile justice research
Index Term(s): Probation or parole decisionmaking ; Prosecutorial discretion ; Public agencies ; Juvenile justice agencies ; History of juvenile justice ; Juvenile probation agencies
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=198620

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.