U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Characterization of Pyrotechnic Reaction Residue Particles by SEM/EDS

NCJ Number
200460
Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume: 48 Issue: 3 Dated: May 2003 Pages: 531-537
Author(s)
Ken L. Kosanke Ph.D.; Richard C. Dujay Ph.D.; Bonnie Kosanke M.S.
Date Published
May 2003
Length
7 pages
Annotation
Although using the combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) is well established from decades of use in gunshot residues (GSR) analysis and the same methodology applies to the detection and analysis of pyrotechnic reaction residue (PRR) particles, relatively little information on its use for PRR particle analysis has appeared in the literature; this paper intends to increase awareness of PRR particle analysis and provide some general information about the SEM/EDS methodology.
Abstract
This paper first describes the SEM/EDS equipment used in the work described in this paper. This is followed by a description of PRR particles. The description notes that in virtually every case, pyrotechnic reactions, either in fires or explosions, produce sufficient thermal energy to yield molten reaction products. The distribution of particle size depends on the nature of the pyrotechnic composition and the conditions under which they are produced. One section of the paper explains the process of PRR particle identification, followed by the presentation of a case example of the use of SEM/EDS in the characterization of PRR particles. The authors conclude that the SEM/EDS methodology to identify and analyze PRR particles in the course of investigating incidents that involve pyrotechnic materials can provide information with a degree of sensitivity and specificity that is not possible with other commonly used techniques. Although a few particle assignments may be uncertain, conclusions can collectively be drawn with a high degree of confidence. 4 figures, 3 tables, and 20 references