U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

ESDA Processing and Latent Fingerprint Development: The Humidity Effect

NCJ Number
200463
Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume: 48 Issue: 3 Dated: May 2003 Pages: 564-580
Author(s)
Myriam Azoury M.Sc.; Rachel Gabbay M.Sc.; Drorit Cohen B.A.; Joseph Almog Ph.D.
Date Published
May 2003
Length
17 pages
Annotation
This study examined the influence of humidification in the electrostatic detection apparatus (ESDA) process on the subsequent development of fingerprints on paper items.
Abstract
The study was designed to assess the effect of humidity conditioning for various exposure periods on the quality of fingerprints developed with three chemical reagents: DFO, ninhydrin, and indanedione (the latter in two formulations). Paper exhibits of two types with "controlled" fingerprints were left for different periods of time in the ESDA humidifier, processed by ESDA, and finally treated with the aforementioned fingerprint reagents. Two types of paper were used: A4/80 g white printer paper (paper 1) and white writing paper with a blue grid of the kind often found in student notebooks (paper 2). The study found that the optimal conditions for ESDA detection of indented writing on documents can affect subsequent fingerprint development. Two of the three amino acid reagents, ninhydrin and indanedione, were found to be particularly sensitive to pre-exposure to high humidity. Although very short exposure improved the results, longer exposure (more than a few minutes) significantly reduced the quality of the developed prints. DFO, on the other hand, was found to be much less susceptible to previous humidifications; even 1 hour of exposure to high humidity did not affect fingerprint quality. This paper thus recommends DFO as the technique for fingerprint development on paper items that have been exposed to high humidity. 6 figures, 3 tables, and 12 references