The sample consisted of 190 volunteers, all of whom were residents of California's Central Valley. Of these, 101 were undergraduate students, and the remaining 89 were nonstudent adults. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 86, with a mean age of 28.9. A total of 77 were male and 113 were female. The self-reported racial and ethnic backgrounds of the participants were as follows: 58 percent White, 22 percent Latino, 9 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, 3 percent African-American, and 7 percent "other." Participants were given a hate-crime vignette in which the ethnicity of the victim and offender varied. Participants were asked to render a decision as to whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty of each crime. Should they decide a defendant was guilty, they were asked to choose one of three sentence options. For each of the charges, participants were asked to state, on a scale of 1 to 10, how certain they were of the defendant's guilt. Contrary to the study's original hypothesis, African-American offenders were not treated more harshly by the jurors in this case; in fact, the opposite was true, since the White offender was convicted more often and the jurors were more certain of his guilt. Study limitations are discussed, and suggestions are offered for future research. 3 tables, 6 notes, and 60 references