U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Parking Lot Security (From Understanding and Preventing Car Theft -- Crime Prevention Studies, Volume 17, P 121-145, 2004, Michael G. Maxfield and Ronald V. Clarke, eds.)

NCJ Number
208054
Author(s)
Pat Mayhew; Greg Braun
Date Published
2004
Length
25 pages
Annotation
After a literature review on the security risk for cars in parking lots, this paper examines studies that have assessed the effectiveness of security-prevention interventions in parking lots, with attention to a British program.
Abstract
The literature review indicates that downtown parking facilities tend to have higher risks for cars; long-stay commuter and shopper lots are especially vulnerable to crime; around-the-clock facilities have higher theft rates; and community parking lots on public housing estates attract car thieves, as do lots that cater to youths, street-level lots, lots without access controls, those without manned security, and those with pedestrian walkways. In an effort to increase security in British parking lots, the Secured Car Park (SCP) Award Scheme was created in 1992. Under this scheme, parking lots that meet specified security standards are given "award winner" plaques that can be displayed to attract parkers. Lots are assessed according to standards of surveillance, boundary design, lighting, vehicular access, parking area, pedestrian access, security, signs, and management practices. The awards last for a year, after which lot operators must apply for re-inspection. An evaluation of the scheme has shown significant decreases in car theft on lots following receipt of an award, which has apparently been maintained. A figure rates various factors that make a parking lot more secure. The most effective measures in order of ranking are regular patrols/high staff visibility, closed circuit video surveillance, and good lighting. 3 tables, 17 references, and 11 notes